It's Not Just Jews
One of the more daring and true investigative journalists out there is the author of the following piece. She doesn't spit back information without actually asking true and hard questions.
She is 100% right. Shutting down free speech and not answering the hard questions is bad for America. She raises some of the important points we have never found good answers to.
So to make this a Jewish issue ("those Jews who don't vaccinate make us look bad") is just taking a play from the anti-Semite playbook.
She is 100% right. Shutting down free speech and not answering the hard questions is bad for America. She raises some of the important points we have never found good answers to.
So to make this a Jewish issue ("those Jews who don't vaccinate make us look bad") is just taking a play from the anti-Semite playbook.
MALKIN: Vaccine Skeptics Under Siege
March
9, 2019
120.4k views
Watch out. Capitol Hill
and Silicon Valley have locked their sights on the next targets of a
frightening free speech-squelching purge: independent citizens who dare to
raise questions online about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
I'm vaccinated. My
children are up to date. There's no dispute that vaccines have saved untold
lives. But over the years, I've voiced my concerns about vaccine claims and
government coercion in my newspaper columns and blog posts. These concerns
include my objections to Gardasil mandates for schoolchildren in Texas and
California; schools' threatening parents with jail time for refusing chickenpox
shots for their kids; ineffectiveness of the flu vaccine; contamination issues
at vaccine plants abroad; lack of data on vaccines' long-term and synergistic
effects on children; and pharma-funded politicians' financial conflicts of
interest.
In 2004, I recounted my
family's firsthand experience with bully doctors who balked at even the mildest
questioning of the wisdom of the newborn hepatitis B immunization. When my
husband and I asked if we could simply delay this particular shot, as the
vaccine is for a virus that is contracted mostly through intravenous drug use
and sexual contact, my son's pediatrician angrily kicked us out of her
practice.
Does this informed
skepticism make me and other like-minded parents public health menaces, as the
World Health Organization has proclaimed? Are we "sociopaths," as a
journalist at The Atlantic once sneered? Apparently so.
At a Senate hearing on
Tuesday, Washington state's public health secretary, John Wiesman, demanded
that the feds launch a national campaign to counter "anti-vaccine"
groups that are spreading what he condemned as "false information."
Weisman called for increased funding from the Centers for Disease Control to
combat opponents of the state's push to prevent parents from opting their
children out of immunizations for personal or philosophical reasons. Health
officials have blamed vaccine critics' social media influence for recent
measles outbreaks. So Wiesman further urged Twitter, Facebook and Google to
"use whatever mechanism they have available to stop promoting
pseudoscience."
Let's be clear:
Misinformation of all kinds abounds on the internet. The world's most
influential "mainstream" media websites and celebrity social media
accounts, for example, recklessly fanned the flames of the recent Covington
Catholic High School and Jussie Smollett hate crime hoaxes. No one in
Washington has called for the boycott of The Washington Post or TMZ over their
false and misleading stories. But for some reason (hint: pharmaceutical big
business), politicians and government bureaucrats are now hell-bent on
deplatforming any and all dissenters who challenge mandatory vaccine regimens.
Under pressure from Rep.
Adam Schiff, D-Calif., Amazon pulled the documentaries "Vaxxed: From
Cover-Up to Catastrophe," "Man Made Epidemic" and "Shoot
'em Up: The Truth About Vaccines" from its Prime Video streaming service.
Last week, Google-owned YouTube moved to demonetize "anti-vaccine"
channels, tweak algorithms to suppress vaccine "conspiracy" videos
and combat "vaccine hesitancy." Pinterest blocks users from using the
search terms "vaccine," "vaccinations" and
"anti-vax," no matter the quality of the results. Facebook plans to
downgrade vaccine skeptics' content on newsfeeds, recommended user groups and
ads.
Is there junk science on
the "anti-vaccine" side? Sure. But you can't address this issue
without also addressing the problem with physicians and public health flacks
who are unwilling to discuss the full risks of vaccines as well as their
benefits; pro-vaccination groups that provide incorrect information about
vaccines' duration of protection; physicians who refuse to care for children
who are not "fully" vaccinated; and the comparative risk-benefit ratios
of different vaccines.
As for efficacy,
consider this new data: A recent whooping cough outbreak at the private
Harvard-Westlake School in Los Angeles last week resulted in 30 students
contracting the illness, all of whom were vaccinated. Of 18 unvaccinated students,
none caught the disease. Will pointing this out on my Facebook and Twitter
accounts bring down the Silicon Valley ban hammer?
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky.,
who happens to be a physician and parent himself, was the lone voice of dissent
at the Senate hearing this week. While acknowledging that the benefits of
vaccines generally outweigh their risks, he noted the plain truth that "it
is wrong to say there are no risks to vaccines." He added that over $4
billion has been paid by the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program for
adults and children who have been injured or died as a result of receiving
federally recommended childhood vaccines.
Is it unacceptable
fearmongering to raise that point? How about to share information on vaccine
manufacturers' astonishing exemption from product liability? Or to point
parents to new research findings on brain injuries caused by vaccines, which
can be found at VaccinePapers.org? Or to link them to a recent statement by the
Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, which "strongly opposes
federal interference in medical decisions, including mandated vaccines."
When it comes to
protecting our children, skepticism is always the best medicine. We need more
free speech, not less. Those who seek to suppress debate and discussion in the
name of the "public good" are the true health threats.
Michelle Malkin's email address
is writemalkin@gmail.com.
Comments
Post a Comment